Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da instrumentação de canais radiculares utilizando sistemas reciprocantes de lima única em diferentes comprimentos de trabalho sobre o desenvolvimento de microfissuras apicais utilizando imagens de microtomografia computadorizada (micro-CT). Quarenta incisivos inferiores humanos extraídos foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos (n=10) de acordo com os sistemas e comprimentos de trabalho utilizados para preparar os canais radiculares: Grupo A - WaveOne Gold no forame apical (FA), Grupo B - WaveOne Gold 1 mm aquém do FA (FA-1 mm), Grupo C - Unicone (FA) e grupo D - Unicone (FA-1 mm). Escaneamentos de micro-CT foram realizados antes e após o preparo dos canais a uma resolução isotrópica de 14 μm. Em seguida, três examinadores avaliaram as imagens de secção transversal geradas para detectar microfissuras na porção apical das raízes. Microfissuras apicais foram visualizadas em 3, 1, 1 e 3 espécimes nos grupos A, B, C e D, respectivamente. Todas essas microfissuras observadas após o preparo dos canais radiculares já existiam antes da instrumentação e não foi detectada nenhuma nova microfissura apical. Para todos os grupos, o número de cortes apresentando microfissuras após o preparo dos canais radiculares foi o mesmo verificado antes do preparo dos canais. A instrumentação de canais radiculares utilizando WaveOne Gold e Unicone, independentemente do comprimento de trabalho, não foi associada à formação de microfissuras apicais.

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of root canal preparation with single-file reciprocating systems at different working lengths on the development of apical microcracks using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging. Forty extracted human mandibular incisors were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=10) according to the systems and working length used to prepare the root canals: Group A - WaveOne Gold at apical foramen (AF), Group B - WaveOne Gold 1 mm short of the AF (AF-1 mm), Group C - Unicone (AF) and Group D - Unicone (AF-1 mm). Micro-CT scanning was performed before and after root canal preparation at an isotropic resolution of 14 µm. Then, three examiners assessed the cross-sectional images generated to detect microcracks in the apical portion of the roots. Apical microcracks were visualized in 3, 1, 1, and 3 specimens in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. All these microcracks observed after root canal preparation already existed prior to instrumentation, and no new apical microcrack was detected. For all groups, the number of slices presenting microcracks after root canal preparation was the same as before canal preparation. Root canal preparation with WaveOne Gold and Unicone, regardless of the working length, was not associated with apical microcrack formation.

AIM: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate the ability of three NiTi rotary systems to maintain the original root canal anatomy. METHODS: Sixty mesiobuccal canals of human mandibular first molars were divided into three groups with 20 root canals each. All teeth were scanned by CBCT before instrumentation. The images were captured digitally for further analysis using the Image Tools Software. The images were sectioned in three points, located at 9 mm, 6 mm and 3mm from the apex. In Group 1, the root canals were instrumented with ProTaper UniversalTM rotary system; in Group 2, with Twisted FileTM rotary system; and in Group 3, with MtwoTM rotary system. Instrumented teeth were scanned again using CBCT and the images of the uninstrumented canals were compared with images of the instrumented canals. The results were statistically analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. A level of significance of 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS: The means of D1 at distances of 9 mm, 6 mm, and 3 mm from the apex were, respectively: Group 1: 0.88±0.257, 1.00±0.000, and 1.00±0.000; Group 2: 0.79±0.745, 0.65±0.669, and 0.25±0; Group 3: 0.50±0.745, 0.33±0.472, and 0.03±0.104. The means of D2 at distances of 9 mm, 6mm, and 3mm from the apex were respectively: Group 1: 1.00±0.00, 1.00±0.00, and 1.00±0.00; Group 2: 0.41±0.299, 0.30±0.428, and 0.50±0.707; Group 3: 0.58±0.910, 0.85±1.857, and 0.31±0.643. CONCLUSIONS: The CBCT analysis revealed that the ProTaper UniversalTM produced centered preparations and while the Twisted FileTM and MtwoTM rotary systems produced canal deviation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the instrumented walls of root canals prepared with the ProTaper UniversalTM rotary system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty mesiobuccal canals of human first mandibular molars were divided into 2 groups of 10 specimens each and embedded in a muffle system. The root canals were transversely sectioned 3 mm short of the apex before preparation and remounted in their molds. All root canals were prepared with ProTaper UniversalTM rotary system or with NitiflexTM files. The pre and postoperative images of the apical thirds viewed with a stereoscopic magnifier (X45) were captured digitally for further analysis. Data were analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test at 5% significance level. RESULTS: The differences observed between the instrumented and the noninstrumented walls were not statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The NitiflexTM files and the ProTaper UniversalTM rotary system failed to instrument all the root canal walls.